Able v. Southern Combing Gin Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Able v. Southern Combing Gin Co.

80 S.E. 287, 141 Ga. 23, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 294

DecidedNovember 14, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 80 S.E. 287 (Able v. Southern Combing Gin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Able v. Southern Combing Gin Co., 80 S.E. 287, 141 Ga. 23, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 294 (Ga. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

A motion to set aside a judgment against a garnishee, rendered by default (there being an entry by the sheriff of service of summons of garnishment on the garnishee), on the ground “that failure to answer any summons of garnishment, if any was served upon the defendant or its officers, was the result of inadvertence or mistake,” to which the sheriff is no party, should not be granted on conflicting evidence as to service, inasmuch as the sheriff’s return is Untraversed, and therefore conclusive on that issue. O’Neill Mfg. Co. v. Ahrens & Ott Mfg. Co., 110 Ga. 656 (36 S. E. 66) ; Clarke v. Fox, 113 Ga. 1053 (30 S. E. 479); Kellam v. Todd, 114 Ga. 981 (41 S. E. 39); 8 Enc. Dig. Ga. R. 147; and see Jones v. Bibb Brick Co., 120 Ga. 321, 328 (48 S. E. 25).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

' Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Maddox. Walker superior court. November 7, 1912.

H. P. Lumpkin, for plaintiff. Foust & Payne, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

A motion to set aside a judgment against a garnishee, rendered by default (there being an entry by the sheriff of service of summons of garnishment on the garnishee), on the ground “that failure to answer any summons of garnishment, if any was served upon the defendant or its officers, was the result of inadvertence or mistake,” to which the sheriff is no party, should not be granted on conflicting evidence as to service, inasmuch as the sheriff’s return is Untraversed, and therefore conclusive on that issue. O’Neill Mfg. Co. v. Ahrens & Ott Mfg. Co., 110 Ga. 656 (36 S. E. 66) ; Clarke v. Fox, 113 Ga. 1053 (30 S. E. 479); Kellam v. Todd, 114 Ga. 981 (41 S. E. 39); 8 Enc. Dig. Ga. R. 147; and see Jones v. Bibb Brick Co., 120 Ga. 321, 328 (48 S. E. 25).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

' Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Maddox. Walker superior court. November 7, 1912.

H. P. Lumpkin, for plaintiff. Foust & Payne, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 S.E. 287, 141 Ga. 23, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/able-v-southern-combing-gin-co-ga-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack