Able v. Bloomfield

6 Tex. 263
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 6 Tex. 263 (Able v. Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Able v. Bloomfield, 6 Tex. 263 (Tex. 1851).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

This is an application by the appellee Tor an affirmance of judgment under the 7th section of the act of 1850. (I-Iart. Dig., p. 882.)

On inspection of the judgment it appears to have been rendered in a case brought by appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, and for an amount not within the jurisdiction of the District Court. That court, therefore, had not jurisdiction to render the judgment which we are asked to affirm. It is well settled that when the court a quo had not jurisdiction, the appellate court cannot acquire it by appeal. It is manifest that this court cannot give judgment in a case not within its jurisdiction. Want of jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit will arrest a cause at any stage of the proceedings. If tlie District Court had jurisdiction upon an application like the present, under the statute requiring an affirmance of judgment without reference to the merits, this court would not look into the record for the purpose of revising any error which may have been committed in the exercise of that jurisdiction; hut not having jurisdiction of the case, it cannot be entertained for any purpose, and must therefore be stricken from the docket.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bullock v. Mel Powers Investment Builder
682 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
State v. Producers Utilities Corp.
602 S.W.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Bullock v. Adickes
593 S.W.2d 805 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Longley v. Plummer
551 S.W.2d 87 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Kountze
543 S.W.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
City of Beaumont v. West
484 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Live Oak County v. Lower Nueces River Water Supply District
446 S.W.2d 14 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Galley v. Hedrick
127 S.W.2d 978 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Weeks v. De Young
290 S.W. 852 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Goodman v. Schwind
186 S.W. 282 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Parker v. Watt
178 S.W. 718 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Tompkins v. Pendleton
160 S.W. 290 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Taylor v. Lee
139 S.W. 908 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Watson v. Baker
2 S.W. 375 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)
Timmins v. Bonner & Long
58 Tex. 554 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Newman v. McCallum
1 White & W. 111 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
Miller v. City Bank
1 Tex. L. R. 360 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
Miller v. City Bank
1 White & W. 746 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1882)
Griffin v. Brown
1 White & W. 618 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Tex. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/able-v-bloomfield-tex-1851.