Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Able v. Able

Able v. Able

222 A.D.2d 1125, 635 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 22, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 1125 (Able v. Able) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Able v. Able, 222 A.D.2d 1125, 635 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and application granted. Memorandum. Defendant was forced to incur counsel fees and costs based upon the failure of plaintiff to pay court-ordered maintenance and his meritless legal claims (see, Brancoveanu v Brancoveanu, 156 AD2d 410; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). We, therefore, conclude that it was an abuse of discretion to deny defendant’s application for counsel fees and costs. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Attorney’s Fees.) Present— Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. Estate of Cooper
8 A.D.3d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Vicinanzo v. Vicinanzo
233 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D.2d 1125, 635 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/able-v-able-nyappdiv-1995.