Able Industries, Inc. v. Pohlman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Able Industries, Inc. v. Pohlman

867 S.W.2d 596, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1713, 1993 WL 439230

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 2, 1993·No. No. 62980·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Donald R. Pohlman, appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 74.05(c) motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Donald R. Pohlman, appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 74.05(c) motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Able Industries, Inc. v. Pohlman, 867 S.W.2d 596, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1713, 1993 WL 439230 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 596 (Able Industries, Inc. v. Pohlman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.