Abitbul v. Tello
This text of Abitbul v. Tello (Abitbul v. Tello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MOSHE ABITBUL, No. 75051 Appellant, vs. YESENIA TELLO, Respondent. FILE APR 1 6 2018 A. BROWN f ce, / 0 P MC7 C0
TY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal: from a district court order issuing a temporary protective order. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Vincent Ochoa, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order issuing a temporary protective order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d. 1152 (1984). Because no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order issuing a temporary protective order, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED
Cherry
Parraguirre
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 19474 cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge Moshe Abitbul McKellar Family Law Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, Inc. Eighth District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abitbul v. Tello, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abitbul-v-tello-nev-2018.