Abisuk Sinsaeng v. Loretta E. Lynch

647 F. App'x 701
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2016·No. 13-72420·Unpublished

Opinions

MEMORANDUM **

Abisuk Sinsaeng, a native and citizen of Thailand, was convicted of dissuading a victim or witness in violation of CaLPenal Code § 136.1(b)(1). The Immigration Judge ordered him removed to Thailand, finding his conviction to be an aggravated felony because it is an offense relating to obstruction of justice under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Applying the interpretation of “obstruction of justice” articulated in In re Valenzuela Gallardo, 25 I. & N. Dec. 838 (BIA 2012), the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Sinsaeng’s appeal. Sinsaeng now petitions for review.1

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). In light of our decision in Valenzuela Gallardo v. Lynch, No. 12-72326, we remand to the Board for either application of the agency interpretation announced in In re Espinoza-Gonzalez, 22 I. & N. Dec. 889 (BIA 1999), or consideration of a new construction of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S).

PETITION GRANTED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abisuk Sinsaeng v. Loretta E. Lynch, 647 F. App'x 701 (9th Cir. 2016).

647 F. App'x 701 (Abisuk Sinsaeng v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

VALENZUELA GALLARDO
25 I. & N. Dec. 838 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2012)
ESPINOZA
22 I. & N. Dec. 889 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1999)