Abington v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Abington v. Travelers Insurance Co.

166 So. 2d 39, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1833

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 24, 1964·No. No. 1175·Published

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Dunbar v. Sutton et al., 166 So.2d 37. These two [40] cases were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal and separate decisions are being rendered by us on this date.

In the present matter the plaintiffs were passengers in the automobile being driven by Mr. Kerlin Sutton. They sued Leon Dunbar’s insurer for damages.

For the reasons set out in our decision in said companion case, we have found that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of Mr. Kerlin Sutton and that Mr. Leon Dunbar was free of negligence.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs appellants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Dunbar v. Sutton et al., 166 So.2d 37. These two [40] cases were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal and separate decisions are being rendered by us on this date.

In the present matter the plaintiffs were passengers in the automobile being driven by Mr. Kerlin Sutton. They sued Leon Dunbar’s insurer for damages.

For the reasons set out in our decision in said companion case, we have found that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of Mr. Kerlin Sutton and that Mr. Leon Dunbar was free of negligence.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs appellants.

Affirmed.

Abington v. Travelers Insurance Co., 166 So. 2d 39, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1833 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

166 So. 2d 39 (Abington v. Travelers Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related