Abilene Retail 30, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners
This text of 508 F.3d 958 (Abilene Retail 30, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[959]*959ORDER
The appellees’ petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision in this case.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was requested and a majority of the active judges voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Tacha and Judges Kelly, O’Brien, Tymkovich and Gorsuch voted to grant rehearing. Judge Gorsuch filed a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, and he was joined in this dissent by Judge Kelly. Judge Lucero filed a response to the dissent. The dissent and response are attached and incorporated in this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
508 F.3d 958, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25367, 2007 WL 3168273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abilene-retail-30-inc-v-board-of-commissioners-ca10-2007.