Abigail Sumigcay Ramos-Arausa v. Jose Samuel Arausa
This text of Abigail Sumigcay Ramos-Arausa v. Jose Samuel Arausa (Abigail Sumigcay Ramos-Arausa v. Jose Samuel Arausa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-23-00267-CV ___________________________
ABIGAIL SUMIGCAY RAMOS-ARAUSA, Appellant
V.
JOSE SAMUEL ARAUSA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-0134-367
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
We have considered Appellant’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss her
appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),
43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 21, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abigail Sumigcay Ramos-Arausa v. Jose Samuel Arausa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abigail-sumigcay-ramos-arausa-v-jose-samuel-arausa-texapp-2023.