Abid Vs. Abid (Child Custody)

472 P.3d 189

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LYUDMYLA A. ABID, A/K/A No. 80933 LYUDMYLA PYANKOVSKA, Appellant, vs.

FILED

SEAN R. ABID, SEP 1 8 2020 Res • ondent.

ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY

4-11;1#41

DEPUTC̀:CLE

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order concern ng child custody. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Vincent Ocla, Judge.

This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). NRAP 3A(b)(7) allows an appeal from an order that finally establishes or alters child custody. The district court's November 26, 2019, order, which is the subject of this appeal, states that respondent will prepare proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the rnotion to modify custody. The March 20, 2020, order resolving appellant's motion for reconsideration of the November 26 order does not specifically resolve the motion to modify custody. There is no written order in the record resolving the motioJ to modify custody. See Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747

'Once an order is entered resolving appellant's motion to modify custody, the aggrieved party can appeal from that order.

e2o - 3LiLts

P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987) ("[O]nly a written judgment may be appealed."). Thus, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Parraguirre

Hardesty

Cadish

cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge Lyudmyla A. Abid Jones & LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

1,0) 1447A ate015