Abgaryan v. Holder
This text of 333 F. App'x 243 (Abgaryan v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anna Abgaryan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies in Abgaryan’s testimony, and between her testimony and declaration, concerning whether she received a death threat during her 2001 detention. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, Abgaryan’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Abgar-yan’s contention that the IJ demonstrated [244]*244bias because she failed to exhaust this contention before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abgaryan-v-holder-ca9-2009.