Abernethy v. Donahoe

543 F. App'x 352
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. 13-1871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[353] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby R. Abernethy, a former employee of the United States Postal Service, appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Abernethy’s breach of contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Abernethy v. Donahoe, No. 5:11-cv-30077-NKM-BWC (W.D.Va. June 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abernethy v. Donahoe, 543 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2013).

543 F. App'x 352 (Abernethy v. Donahoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morton v. DeJoy
E.D. Virginia, 2024