Abernethy v. Donahoe
This text of 543 F. App'x 352 (Abernethy v. Donahoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[353]*353Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bobby R. Abernethy, a former employee of the United States Postal Service, appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Abernethy’s breach of contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Abernethy v. Donahoe, No. 5:11-cv-30077-NKM-BWC (W.D.Va. June 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 F. App'x 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abernethy-v-donahoe-ca4-2013.