Abernathy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Abernathy v. State

1919 OK CR 215, 181 P. 945, 16 Okla. Crim. 690, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 192

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 9, 1919

DocketNo. A-3241.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 215 (Abernathy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abernathy v. State, 1919 OK CR 215, 181 P. 945, 16 Okla. Crim. 690, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 192 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A. N. Abernathy was convicted on a charge that he did sell to one Amon Walker intoxicating liquor, to wit, four-ounce bottle of Jamaica ginger, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on January 15, 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. It appears that the plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and no material error was committed.

It follows that the judgment should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A. N. Abernathy was convicted on a charge that he did sell to one Amon Walker intoxicating liquor, to wit, four-ounce bottle of Jamaica ginger, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on January 15, 1918, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. It appears that the plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and no material error was committed.

It follows that the judgment should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 215, 181 P. 945, 16 Okla. Crim. 690, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abernathy-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.