Abernathy v. State

567 S.W.3d 305
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 2019
DocketED 106366
StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 305 (Abernathy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abernathy v. State, 567 S.W.3d 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randall Abernathy (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 S.W.3d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abernathy-v-state-moctapp-2019.