Abernathy v. Abernathy

140 S.E. 382, 165 Ga. 208, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 358
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 18, 1927
DocketNo. 6084
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 140 S.E. 382 (Abernathy v. Abernathy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abernathy v. Abernathy, 140 S.E. 382, 165 Ga. 208, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 358 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The judge in a liabeas-corpus proceeding involving the custody of children must look to the welfare of the children, and has a very wide discretion, within legal limits, in reference to such matters; and where the decision complained of is within such discretion, gross abuse must appear in order to work a reversal of his judgment. No such abuse of discretion appears in this ease. Hollenbeck v. Glover, 128 Ga. 52, 53 (57 S. E. 108). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. B. Hutcheson and M. J. Head, for plaintiff in error. E. S. Griffith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waller v. Waller
43 S.E.2d 535 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Lucas v. Smith
41 S.E.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 382, 165 Ga. 208, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abernathy-v-abernathy-ga-1927.