Abercrombie v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Abercrombie v. Ford Motor Co.

63 S.E.2d 4, 83 Ga. App. 158, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 820

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 10, 1951

Docket32983

StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E.2d 4 (Abercrombie v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abercrombie v. Ford Motor Co., 63 S.E.2d 4, 83 Ga. App. 158, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Townsend, J.

This court on April 14, 1950, reversed a judgment of the superior court in this case, which judgment was in favor of the employer and found the employee claimants not entitled to the benefits of unemployment compensation. Application was made to the Supreme Court of Georgia for the writ of certiorari. The writ was granted by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court upon hearing the writ did, on November 13, 1950 (207 Ga. 464), enter a judgment reversing the judgment of this court on the ground that this court should have entered an affirmance of the judgment of the superior court instead of reversing the same. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of this court, 81 Ga. App. 690 (59 S. E. 2d, 664), reversing the judgment of the superior court, be vacated, and the judgment of said court be and the same is hereby affirmed in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Judgment affirmed,.

MacIntyre, P.J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend, J.

This court on April 14, 1950, reversed a judgment of the superior court in this case, which judgment was in favor of the employer and found the employee claimants not entitled to the benefits of unemployment compensation. Application was made to the Supreme Court of Georgia for the writ of certiorari. The writ was granted by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court upon hearing the writ did, on November 13, 1950 (207 Ga. 464), enter a judgment reversing the judgment of this court on the ground that this court should have entered an affirmance of the judgment of the superior court instead of reversing the same. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of this court, 81 Ga. App. 690 (59 S. E. 2d, 664), reversing the judgment of the superior court, be vacated, and the judgment of said court be and the same is hereby affirmed in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Judgment affirmed,.

MacIntyre, P.J., and Felton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.E.2d 4, 83 Ga. App. 158, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abercrombie-v-ford-motor-co-gactapp-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack