Abercrombie v. Ely

60 Mo. 23
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 60 Mo. 23 (Abercrombie v. Ely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abercrombie v. Ely, 60 Mo. 23 (Mo. 1875).

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit is brought to enforce a mechanic’s -lien against a school house and the lots upon which it was erected, the title to'which was vested in the Board of Education, who are eoder'endants; and the only question in the case, is, whether the building and lots so sued are within the meaning of the law in relation to mechanic’s liens. (Wagn. Stat., 907.)

The terms of the law are' sufficiently general to embrace school houses as well as all other buildings for public purposes ; but the decisions of this court in Dunn vs. N. M. R. R. Co., (24 Mo., 493) and McPheeters vs. Merrimac Bridge Co., (28 Mo., 465) have restricted these terms of the special St. Louis act — and indeed of the general law which uses the [24]*24same terms — to buildings, etc., belonging to private individuals. The reasons for this discrimination are set forth at large in the decisions, and it is unnecessary to repeat them. School houses undoubtedly occupy a position not less favored by the constitution and laws than bridges.

Besides, these decisions were made long anterior .to the present lien law, and if the legislature had been dissatisfied with them, the terms of the law could have been easily modified so as to embrace such buildings. But the general law has adopted the same terms used in the special law, since the decisions referred to.

We think, therefore, the demurrer was properly sustained, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Kansas City v. School District
62 S.W.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)
Peters v. Killibrew
154 P. 996 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1916)
Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash Railroad
104 S.W. 67 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
State ex rel. Maggi v. Loomis
88 Mo. App. 500 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Lessard v. Inhabitants of Revere
50 N.E. 533 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Sweaney v. Kansas City Railway Co.
54 Mo. App. 265 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
City of Clinton ex rel. Thornton v. Henry County
22 S.W. 494 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Dugan Cut-Stone Co. v. Gray
43 Mo. App. 671 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Hovey v. Town of East Providence
9 L.R.A. 156 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1890)
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Tiedemann
69 Mo. 306 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)
Hastings v. Woods
2 Mo. App. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Mo. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abercrombie-v-ely-mo-1875.