Abercrombie v. Brown & Seccomb

264 A.D. 751, 35 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No ■pinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. I James Travers, as Administrator, etc., of Patrick Travers, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Young Men’s Christian Association of the City of New York, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.— Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and a new trial ordered. Under the circumstances disclosed by the record, the question whether the individual (defendant was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the klleged assault was one of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. |(Osipoff v. City of New York, 286 N. Y. 422, 431.) Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abercrombie v. Brown & Seccomb, 264 A.D. 751, 35 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

264 A.D. 751 (Abercrombie v. Brown & Seccomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osipoff v. City of New York
36 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)