Abent v. Michigan Cab Co.

273 N.W. 289, 279 Mich. 617, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 793
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1937
DocketDocket No. 21, Calendar No. 39,348.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 273 N.W. 289 (Abent v. Michigan Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abent v. Michigan Cab Co., 273 N.W. 289, 279 Mich. 617, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 793 (Mich. 1937).

Opinion

Wiest, J.

Plaintiff, in alighting from the rear doorway of a taxicab, placed one foot on the running board and, to steady himself, took hold of the standard to which the opened front door was hinged, with *618 the finger tips of his right hand in the door jamb or crack and, when the driver closed the door, his finger tips were pinched and injured.

This suit was brought to recover damages and upon trial by jury plaintiff had verdict and judgment thereon. The motions of defendants for a directed verdict and judgment non obstante veredicto were denied. Upon review only one error need be considered.

Under our previous holdings plaintiff was guilty of negligence, the proximate cause of his injury. Ordinarily a door jamb or crack is no place for fingers.

The fact, if true, that the driver sometimes looked to see that passengers did not have their fingers in the door jamb, but did not look on this occasion, does not relieve plaintiff from the consequences of his own negligent act.

There was no allegation that the driver wilfully caused the injury. Plaintiff was not alighting from the front doorway but by the rear doorway and that door was hinged at the rear of the car.

The case is ruled by our holdings in Camp v. Spring, 241 Mich. 700; Kerr v. City of Detroit, 255 Mich. 446; McIntyre v. Kunsky Theatres Corp., 256 Mich. 634.

The judgment is reversed without a new trial and, with costs to defendants.

Fead, C. J., and North, Butzel, Bushnell, Sharpe, Potter, and Chandler, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hi-Speed Auto Wash, Inc. v. Simeri
346 N.E.2d 607 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1976)
Clark v. Shefferly
78 N.W.2d 155 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 N.W. 289, 279 Mich. 617, 1937 Mich. LEXIS 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abent-v-michigan-cab-co-mich-1937.