Abella v. Montenay Power Corp.

138 So. 3d 490, 2014 WL 1499679, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 2014
DocketNo. 3D13-270
StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 3d 490 (Abella v. Montenay Power Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abella v. Montenay Power Corp., 138 So. 3d 490, 2014 WL 1499679, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SCALES, J.

Plaintiff, Appellant below, appeals a final summary judgment entered on behalf of all three defendants, Montenay Power Corp., Miami-Dade County, and Hank Clements.

Because no genuine issue of disputed fact exists that Montenay Power Corp. and Hank Clements are entitled to workers’ compensation immunity1, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment for these two defendants.

While, on remand, Miami-Dade County may also be entitled to workers’ compensation immunity, the contract between Miami-Dade County and Florida Power & Light, which may establish that Miami-Dade County was the “statutory employer” of Plaintiff, was not part of the summary judgment evidence before the trial court. Therefore, the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Miami-Dade County was premature.

We therefore affirm the final summary judgment for Montenay Power Corp. and Hank Clements, but reverse the final summary judgment for Miami-Dade County and remand for proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yero v. Miami-Dade County
838 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 3d 490, 2014 WL 1499679, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abella-v-montenay-power-corp-fladistctapp-2014.