Abell v. Potomac Insurance Company

884 F.2d 196, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14689
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1989
Docket87-4260
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 884 F.2d 196 (Abell v. Potomac Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abell v. Potomac Insurance Company, 884 F.2d 196, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14689 (5th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

884 F.2d 196

Edward C. ABELL, Jr., and Carey Walton,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants
v.
POTOMAC INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants,
Joe E. Fryar and Wright, Lindsey & Jennings and Valley Forge
Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

No. 87-4260.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1989.

J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, La., for Fryar.

D. Mark Bienvenu, Lafayette, La., for Valley Forge.

Gene W. Lafitte, Edward J. Gay, III, James A. Brown, New Orleans, La., for Wright, Lindsey & Jennings.

Leslie R. Leavoy, Jr., Alexandria, La., James D. McMichael, Julie E. Schwartz, New Orleans, La., for All American Services, Ltd.

Phillip A. Wittman, Kyle Schoenkas, Judy Y. Barrasso, C. Lawrence Orlansky, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; John M. Shaw, Judge.

Before THORNBERRY, WILLIAMS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and has remanded for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989). See Fryar v. Abell, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). Following remand, the parties have advised us of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving defendant Joe E. Fryar.

This cause is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. The district court shall also consider the appropriate disposition of this matter in light of the pending bankruptcy proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Summit Properties Inc. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
214 F.3d 556 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 F.2d 196, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abell-v-potomac-insurance-company-ca5-1989.