Abell v. Potomac Insurance

884 F.2d 196
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 12, 1989
DocketNo. 87-4260
StatusPublished

This text of 884 F.2d 196 (Abell v. Potomac Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abell v. Potomac Insurance, 884 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and has remanded for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989). See Fryar v. Abell, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). Following remand, the parties have advised us of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving defendant Joe E. Fryar.

This cause is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. The district court shall also consider the appropriate disposition of this matter in light of the pending bankruptcy proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
492 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Fryar v. Abell
492 U.S. 914 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 F.2d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abell-v-potomac-insurance-ca5-1989.