Abell v. Potomac Insurance

Fifth Circuit

Abell v. Potomac Insurance

884 F.2d 196

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Abell v. Potomac Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 F.2d 1104 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 12, 1989·No. No. 87-4260·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and has remanded for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989). See Fryar v. Abell, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). Following remand, the parties have advised us of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving defendant Joe E. Fryar.

This cause is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. The district court shall also consider the appropriate disposition of this matter in light of the pending bankruptcy proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and has remanded for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989). See Fryar v. Abell, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). Following remand, the parties have advised us of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving defendant Joe E. Fryar.

This cause is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. The district court shall also consider the appropriate disposition of this matter in light of the pending bankruptcy proceeding.

Abell v. Potomac Insurance, 884 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

884 F.2d 196 (Abell v. Potomac Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related