Abel v. Tinsley

Tenth Circuit

Abel v. Tinsley

314 F.2d 342

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 1963

DocketNos. 7171, 7172

StatusPublished

This text of 314 F.2d 342 (Abel v. Tinsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abel v. Tinsley, 314 F.2d 342 (10th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the entire; record before us, including the transcript of the trial proceedings had in the District Court of Gunnison County, Colorado, shows that the findings of fact made by the court below are amply supported by the evidence.

The denial of the writ of habeas corpus by the lower court is affirmed in accordance with the views expressed in that court’s exhaustive Memorandum Opinion,, reported in D. C., 213 F.Supp. 784, without written opinion here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the entire; record before us, including the transcript of the trial proceedings had in the District Court of Gunnison County, Colorado, shows that the findings of fact made by the court below are amply supported by the evidence.

The denial of the writ of habeas corpus by the lower court is affirmed in accordance with the views expressed in that court’s exhaustive Memorandum Opinion,, reported in D. C., 213 F.Supp. 784, without written opinion here.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 F.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abel-v-tinsley-ca10-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack