Abel v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
128 N.Y. 662
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Earl and G-ray, JJ., who dissent on the ground of error in charge, and Peokham, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abel v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co., 128 N.Y. 662 (N.Y. 1891).
128 N.Y. 662 (Abel v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Payne v. Oakland Traction Co.
113 P. 1074 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad
142 A.D. 31 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Stone v. Union Pacific Railroad
100 P. 362 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)
McCoy v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
77 N.E. 1174 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
McCoy v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
185 N.Y. 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
Devoe v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
66 N.E. 568 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Devoe v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
174 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
63 N.E. 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Bell v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.
36 A.D. 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Little Rock & M. R. v. Barry
84 F. 944 (Eighth Circuit, 1898)
Simmons v. Peters
32 N.Y.S. 680 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Mulvaney v. Brooklyn City Railroad
21 N.Y.S. 427 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1892)
Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
20 N.Y.S. 708 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1892)