Abel v. Forgue
1 Root 502
This text of 1 Root 502 (Abel v. Forgue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Abel v. Forgue, 1 Root 502 (Colo. 1793).
Opinion
The motion in arrest is insufficient, and the defendant must have judgment. The plaintiff’s consenting to the release of said Jonathan from imprisonment on said execution was a discharge of said Erancis. Eor where two are jointly charged and imprisoned on an execution, the creditor’s-consenting to the release of one, is a discharge of both.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walkup v. Pratt
5 H. & J. 51 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1820)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abel-v-forgue-conn-1793.