Abel v. Bennet

1 Root 127
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The escape was a negligent escape in the sheriff, and it was a breach of the condition of said note. The sheriff undoubtedly had his election, either to make fresh pursuit and reclaim his prisoner, or to take his remedy upon the bond; but neither the prisoner nor the bondsman, in such case, could oblige the sheriff to receive her, after the escape.

In the case of Jones v. Sheriff Abbey, Windham Superior Court, March term, 1189, adjudged- — -That the escape of a prisoner who hath the liberties of the- yard on bond, is a negligent escape, only in the sheriff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abel v. Bennet, 1 Root 127 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

1 Root 127 (Abel v. Bennet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drake v. Chester
2 Conn. 473 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1818)