Abeel v. Wolcott
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 249 (Abeel v. Wolcott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application is to set aside a writ of inquiry, when there is none before the court. There is no return, no inquisition, and nothing to set aside. There was a written agreement, which does not appear to have been complied with. The plaintiff is in possession of his own writ of inquiry, and we see no objection to his issuing a new one; for as the writ is not before us, we cannot grant him the effect of his motion as to setting it aside.
Motion denied.
See next p. Van, Der Mark v. Jackson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cai. Cas. 249, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abeel-v-wolcott-nysupct-1803.