Abebe v. Sutton

479 F. App'x 466
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6746
StatusPublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 466 (Abebe v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abebe v. Sutton, 479 F. App'x 466 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Unula Boo Shawn Abebe appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abebe v. Sutton, No. 5:12-cv-00202-MBS, 2012 WL 1096153 (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F. App'x 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abebe-v-sutton-ca4-2012.