Abe Cooper-Syracuse, Inc. v. State

8 A.D.2d 578, 183 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9738
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1959
DocketClaim No. 33795
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.2d 578 (Abe Cooper-Syracuse, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abe Cooper-Syracuse, Inc. v. State, 8 A.D.2d 578, 183 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Judgment modified upon the facts to reduce the award from the sum of $170,600 to $152,172 with interest, and as so modified judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The trial court in its decision found that certain equipment owned by claimant and located on the appropriated land was operated by electrical power consisting of overhead and underground installations. It was further found that as a result of the taking these installations would be abandoned and new equipment installed elsewhere upon the unappropriated land. The court found “the fair and reasonable cost of performing said work for the installation of the necessary electrical services is * * * $18,428.” and included this amount in the fair market value of the property before the taking. This was erroneous. The record contains no proof of the value of the existing installations in their depreciated condition. The stated amount was not the cost of performing the work of installation. At least $12,000 of the amount represented the cost of new conduits, switches, panels, controls and other equipment. While there was testimony that the “ existing service ” would have to be abandoned there is no proof that the existing switches, panels, controls and similar equipment would not be usable. The liability of the State was not to furnish claimant with a completely new electrical installation but to pay just compensation for the land and improvements thereon. It follows that the award should be reduced by the sum of $18,428. All concur. (Cross appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for [579]*579appropriation o£ realty.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Williams, Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of City of Ny (Civitano)
348 N.E.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 578, 183 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abe-cooper-syracuse-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1959.