Abdush-Shahid v. City of New York

2017 NY Slip Op 737, 147 A.D.3d 426, 45 N.Y.S.3d 798
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 2017·No. 2987 105695/95 -6593·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered June 18, 2014, which, at the close of plaintiff’s case, granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. The record shows that during plaintiff’s direct case, he failed to present any evidence that it was reasonably foreseeable that he would be attacked by fellow inmates, or that defendants had inadequate security procedures in place (see Harris v City of New York, 28 AD3d 223 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 704 [2006]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Motion to supplement brief denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdush-Shahid v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 737, 147 A.D.3d 426, 45 N.Y.S.3d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 737 (Abdush-Shahid v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. City of New York
28 A.D.3d 223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)