Abdulselam v. Mukasey
This text of 283 F. App'x 87 (Abdulselam v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jemal Muktar Abdulselam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying as untimely Abdulselam’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Abdulselam’s motion; accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008) (“The decision to grant or deny a motion to reopen ... is within the discretion of the Board....”); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744-45 (4th Cir.2006) (stating abuse of discretion standard). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 F. App'x 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdulselam-v-mukasey-ca4-2008.