Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Abdullah v. State

Abdullah v. State

679 So. 2d 846, 1996 WL 515289
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1996·No. 96-2102·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

679 So.2d 846 (1996)

Saboor ABDULLAH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-2102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 12, 1996.

*847 Saboor Abdullah, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Abudullah's motion filed pursuant to Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.800(a). Claims relating to whether a plea has been voluntarily entered or effective assistance of counsel must be raised in a Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.850 motion. See Maddox v. State, 673 So.2d 198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Nowlin v. State, 639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdullah v. State, 679 So. 2d 846, 1996 WL 515289 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 846 (Abdullah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilliary v. State
988 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Clark v. State
969 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Miller v. State
829 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Spangler v. State
797 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Perry v. State
699 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)