Abdullah v. State
This text of 679 So. 2d 846 (Abdullah v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Saboor ABDULLAH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*847 Saboor Abdullah, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of Abudullah's motion filed pursuant to Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.800(a). Claims relating to whether a plea has been voluntarily entered or effective assistance of counsel must be raised in a Florida Criminal Rule of Procedure 3.850 motion. See Maddox v. State, 673 So.2d 198 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Nowlin v. State, 639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 So. 2d 846, 1996 WL 515289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdullah-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.