Abdullah v. Finney

Fourth Circuit

Abdullah v. Finney

673 F. App'x 344

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2017·No. No. 16-7288·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Muttaqin F. Abdullah appeals the district court’s order adopting, the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdullah v. Finney, No. 3:16-cv-01276-JFA (D.S.C. filed Sept. 13, and entered Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argu-ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Muttaqin F. Abdullah appeals the district court’s order adopting, the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdullah v. Finney, No. 3:16-cv-01276-JFA (D.S.C. filed Sept. 13, and entered Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argu-ment would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Abdullah v. Finney, 673 F. App'x 344 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

673 F. App'x 344 (Abdullah v. Finney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related