Abdullah v. Duff

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 2, 2009·No. Civil Action No. 2009-0610·Published

Opinion

.. FILED APR 02 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk,u.s. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts

Muhammed M. Abdullah, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

Civil Action No.

09 0610

James C. Duff, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a determination that the complaint, among other grounds, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Salters, South Carolina.

He seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ("A.O.") to perform his duty to "investigate the work of the probation officers and make recommendations concerning the same to the respective judges[.]" 18 U.S.C. § 3672. This Court's mandamus authority extends only to "officer[s] or employee[s] of the United States or any agency thereof[.]" 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The mandamus statute "appl[ies] to matters arising in the executive branch and its administrative agencies." Seltzer v. Foley, 502 F. Supp. 600, 602 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). The A.O. is part of the judicial branch of the federal government. See 28 U.S.C. § 601 ("Director and a Deputy Director [are] appointed and subject to removal by the

Chief Justice of the United States, after consulting with the Judicial Conference."). The complaint therefore fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: March ?.3~, 2009 ~{d~~

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdullah v. Duff, (D.D.C. 2009).

Abdullah v. Duff (Abdullah v. Duff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seltzer v. Foley
502 F. Supp. 600 (S.D. New York, 1980)