Abdullah v. City of New York

667 N.E.2d 334, 88 N.Y.2d 865, 644 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 730
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 667 N.E.2d 334 (Abdullah v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abdullah v. City of New York, 667 N.E.2d 334, 88 N.Y.2d 865, 644 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 730 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal and motion for reargument, insofar as the motions are made by Nathaniel Abdullah [866]*866purportedly on behalf of Garry Williams, dismissed upon the ground that Abdullah is not Williams’ authorized legal representative; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for reargument otherwise dismissed as untimely. [See, 84 NY2d 1018; 85 NY2d 954.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 N.E.2d 334, 88 N.Y.2d 865, 644 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdullah-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1996.