Abdule v. Jaddou
This text of Abdule v. Jaddou (Abdule v. Jaddou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 District Judge Barbara J. Rothstein
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9
10 DEKA AHMED ABDULE and BASHIR Case No. 2:21-cv-01558-BJR MOHAMED HASHI, 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 12 v. Note on Motion Calendar: 13 March 10, 2022 14 UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; 15 THOMAS SMITHAM, Charges d’Affairs of the United States Embassy in Rome, Italy; ANTONY J. 16 BLINKEN, United States Secretary of State, United States Department of State; ALEJANDRO 17 MAYORKAS, Secretary of Department of 18 Homeland Security;
19 Defendants. 20 21 COME NOW, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, 22 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 10(g) and 16, and hereby jointly 23 stipulate and move for an extension of 45 days for Defendants to respond to the Complaint. The 24 response date had previously extended the response date until March 14, 2022 and stayed initial 25 scheduling dates. 26 27 1 A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial 2 and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 3 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). The underlying facts continue to evolve and there is a 4 significant likelihood that the matter could either become moot or the parties are able to resolve 5 it without the need for litigation. Therefore, the parties believe good cause exists for a brief stay 6 to save the Court and the parties from spending unnecessary time and resources on it. 7 In light of the above, the parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court: 8 1. Extend Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to May 2, 2022. 9 2. Continue to stay all other initial scheduling dates. 10 11 Stipulated to and presented this 10th day of March, 2022.
12 MENTER IMMIGRATION LAW PLLC NICHOLAS W. BROWN United States Attorney 13
14 s/ Meena Pallipamu Menter s/ Nickolas Bohl MEENA PALLIPAMU MENTER, WSBA #31870 NICKOLAS BOHL WSBA #48978 15 4444 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 203 Assistant United States Attorney Seattle, Washington 98103 United States Attorney’s Office 16 Phone: 206-419-7332 700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220 17 Fax: 206-407-2594 Seattle, Washington 98101-1271 Email: meena@meenamenter.com Phone: 206-553-7970 18 Fax: 206-553-4067 Counsel for Plaintiffs Email: nickolas.bohl@usdoj.gov 19 Counsel for Defendants 20
22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER 1 The parties having stipulated and agreed, it is hereby so ORDERED. 2 3 DATED this 17th day of March, 2022. 4 A 5 6 Barbara Jacobs Rothstein 7 U.S. District Court Judge
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abdule v. Jaddou, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdule-v-jaddou-wawd-2022.