Abdul v. ICE Field Office Director

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided October 28, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00690·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Petitioner, Case No. C20-0690-RAJ v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, Respondent.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS: (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation; (2) The Government’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (3) Petitioner’s habeas petition (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (4) Petitioner’s request for release is DENIED; (5) Petitioner’s request for a bond hearing is GRANTED. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Government shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to Diouf v. Napolitano (“Diouf II”), 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2011), and Aleman Gonzalez v. Barr, 955 F.3d 762 (9th Cir. 2020); and (6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge Theiler. Dated this 28th day of October, 2020. A The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdul v. ICE Field Office Director, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Abdul v. ICE Field Office Director (Abdul v. ICE Field Office Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diouf v. Napolitano
634 F.3d 1081 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Esteban Aleman Gonzalez v. William Barr
955 F.3d 762 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)