Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns

Fourth Circuit

Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns

50 F. App'x 173

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2002·No. No. 02-7424·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Khidr Abdul-Khabir appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abdub-Khabir v. Steams, No. CA-02-708-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Khidr Abdul-Khabir appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abdub-Khabir v. Steams, No. CA-02-708-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns, 50 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 173 (Abdul-Khabir v. Stearns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related