Abdu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Bell
This text of 332 F.3d 960 (Abdu-Ali Abdur'Rahman v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
[961]*961“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as a pending appeal. It is further ORDERED that the execution of sentence is stayed pending further order of this Court.
The Clerk -will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule these cases for oral argument at a later date.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F.3d 960, 2003 WL 21384403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdu-ali-abdurrahman-v-bell-ca6-2003.