Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service
This text of 63 F. App'x 163 (Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Alfred Abdo, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) permanently enjoining him from — among other things— giving tax advice, preparing income tax returns for others, and promoting abusive tax schemes; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Abdo v. Internal Revenue Serv., No. CA-01-98-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 8 & Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdo-v-united-states-internal-revenue-service-ca4-2003.