Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service

Fourth Circuit

Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service

63 F. App'x 163

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2003·No. No. 03-1143·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Abdo, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) permanently enjoining him from — among other things— giving tax advice, preparing income tax returns for others, and promoting abusive tax schemes; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Abdo v. Internal Revenue Serv., No. CA-01-98-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 8 & Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Abdo, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) permanently enjoining him from — among other things— giving tax advice, preparing income tax returns for others, and promoting abusive tax schemes; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Abdo v. Internal Revenue Serv., No. CA-01-98-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 8 & Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service, 63 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 163 (Abdo v. United States Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related