Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc.

225 A.D.2d 498, 639 N.Y.2d 811, 639 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

We agree with the IAS Court that it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that there is no "real relationship” between the article, which concerns newsworthy fashion trends in the Black community (see, Stephano v News Group Publs., 64 NY2d 174), and the photograph in which plaintiff appears in the background wearing traditional African garb (cf., Finger v Omni Publs. Intl., 77 NY2d 138). We also agree with the IAS court that plaintiff’s claim that the article is an "advertisement in disguise” is too speculative to raise a bona fide issue of fact (see, Stephano v News Group Publs., supra, at 186; Cruz v Latin News Impacto Newspaper, 216 AD2d 50). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 498, 639 N.Y.2d 811, 639 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 498 (Abdelrazig v. Essence Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Khozissova v. Ralph Lauren Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 03332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing
208 F.3d 122 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing
727 N.E.2d 549 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)