ABDELMALIK v. State

347 S.W.3d 563, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 885, 2011 WL 2534358
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2011·No. WD 72235·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Dawud Abdelmalik appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing by the Circuit Court of Jackson County (“motion court”). On appeal, he claims that the motion court erred in determining that his trial counsel (“Counsel”) was not constitutionally ineffective in failing to raise claims that: (1) Abdelmalik’s second trial was in violation of the double-jeopardy protections in the United States and Missouri Constitutions; and (2) section 650.055 RSMo, as applied to the collection of Ab-delmalik’s DNA sample, violates the Missouri Constitution’s prohibition against laws that operate retrospectively. We affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ABDELMALIK v. State, 347 S.W.3d 563, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 885, 2011 WL 2534358 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

347 S.W.3d 563 (ABDELMALIK v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hensley
347 S.W.3d 563 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)