Abdelkadir v. United States Postal Service

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: April 2, 2021
• Docket: 2:20-cv-01725
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 MOHAMED ABDELKADIR, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C20-1725-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., 12 Defendants. 13

14 On November 17, 2020, Plaintiff Mohamed Abdelkadir, proceeding pro se, filed his 15 complaint in this matter. (Dkt. # 1.) At the time Plaintiff filed his complaint, Plaintiff did not 16 provide summonses for the Clerk to issue. (See id.) Based on Plaintiff’s failure to perfect service 17 within 90 days of filing his complaint, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause on March 16, 18 2021. (Dkt. # 5.) On March 30, 2021, Plaintiff responded by providing documents purportedly 19 demonstrating that Plaintiff sent a new civil cover sheet for this action, a complaint with redacted 20 personal identifiers, and summonses requests to the Court on December 3, 2020. (Dkt. # 6 at 1.) 21 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(1), a summons must be served with a 22 copy of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1). Plaintiff is responsible for serving the summons 23 and complaint within the time allowed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) to effect 1 proper service. Id. Under Rule 4(m), the Court may dismiss an action without prejudice if a 2 plaintiff fails to effect proper service within 90 days of filing the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 3 However, if Plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the Court must extend the time for service 4 for an appropriate period. Id.; see Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2007)

5 (“District courts have broad discretion to extend time for service under Rule 4(m).”). 6 Here, Plaintiff has failed to perfect service to Defendants or otherwise demonstrate that 7 Defendants have been properly served in this matter within 90 days of filing his complaint. 8 Based on Plaintiff’s response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, it appears Plaintiff may have 9 attempted to request the Clerk of Court to issue summonses back in December 2020. (See dkt. 10 # 6.) Nevertheless, it does not appear from the record that Plaintiff ever submitted proper 11 summonses requests for the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for this matter or that Plaintiff 12 has properly served Defendants. 13 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff an additional (30) thirty days from the date of 14 this Order to effect proper service to Defendants and to file proof of service with the Court.

15 Should Plaintiff fail to timely serve Defendants, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint 16 without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). 17 18 Dated this 2nd day of April, 2021. 19 20 A 21 MICHELLE L. PETERSON United States Magistrate Judge 22