Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Abdelaziz Hamze v. State

Abdelaziz Hamze v. State

150 So. 3d 1230, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18841, 2014 WL 6460592
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 2014
Docket4D14-1112
StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 3d 1230 (Abdelaziz Hamze v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abdelaziz Hamze v. State, 150 So. 3d 1230, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18841, 2014 WL 6460592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

. PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion. The trial court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion in light of appellant’s pending appeal of a prior rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider this court’s opinions in Marshall v. State, 91 So.3d 277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), Jackman v. State, 88 So.3d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), and Lubin v. State, 87 So.3d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Sydoriak v. State, 92 So.3d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). As in those cases, we express no opinion on the merits of appellant’s, motion.

Reversed and Remanded.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lubin v. State
87 So. 3d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Jackman v. State
88 So. 3d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Marshall v. State
91 So. 3d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Sydoriak v. State
92 So. 3d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 3d 1230, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18841, 2014 WL 6460592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdelaziz-hamze-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.