Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry

202 F. App'x 593

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2006·No. No. 06-6319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry, No. 5:04-HC-509-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Malachi Abdel-Aziz, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry, No. 5:04-HC-509-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry, 202 F. App'x 593 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

202 F. App'x 593 (Abdel-Aziz v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related