Abdallah v. . Dunn
This text of 134 S.E. 926 (Abdallah v. . Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon an appeal by defendant Dunn to tbis Court, from judgment rendered at June Term, 1924, of Superior Court of Lenoir County, appellant’s assignments of error were sustained and a new trial ordered. Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397. Issues necessary to a judgment finally determining tbe rights of tbe parties, involving tbe amount paid by Dunn to Copeland Bros., by whom tbe note was transferred to Dunn, and tbe application of payments, aggregating $100, made by Miller to Dunn, after tbe transfer of tbe note, were not submitted to tbe jury on tbe former trial. Upon tbe new trial tbe facts involved in tbe issues suggested have been found by tbe jury, upon competent evidence, and under instructions free from error. Appellant’s exceptions to tbe admission of evidence, to issues submitted, and to tbe judgment, cannot be sustained. Tbe judgment is affirmed. There is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 926, 192 N.C. 815, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdallah-v-dunn-nc-1926.