Abdallah v. Coca-Cola Co.

133 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2302, 2001 WL 210000
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia
DecidedJanuary 16, 2001
DocketCIV. A. 1:98CV3679RWS
StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (Abdallah v. Coca-Cola Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abdallah v. Coca-Cola Co., 133 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2302, 2001 WL 210000 (N.D. Ga. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

STORY, District Judge.

The Court having reviewed the final version of the Notice referenced in the Court’s Order of December 22, 2000, hereby finds that the Notice is appropriate. The Coca-Cola Company shall by January 16, 2001, cause the attached Notice to be mailed in the name of the Clerk by First Class Mail to all settlement class members who can be identified by reasonable efforts.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

TO: ALL AFRICAN-AMERICAN PERSONS EMPLOYED BY THE COCA-COLA COMPANY IN SALARIED (EXEMPT OR NON-EXEMPT) POSITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AT ANY TIME FROM APRIL 22, 1995 TO JUNE 14, 2000 (THE “SETTLEMENT CLASS”).

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LAWSUIT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the December 22, 2000 Order of this Court, that the Class Representatives certified by the Court and The Coca-Cola Company have entered *1365 into a Settlement Agreement resolving the class-wide claims in this case.

A hearing will be held before the Honorable Richard W. Story (the “Fairness Hearing”) to determine whether the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated as of November 16, 2000 are fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved; and (2) whether final judgment should be entered by this Court.

The Fairness Hearing will be held on May 29, 2001, in Courtroom 2306 of the United States Courthouse, 75 Spring Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia. You are permitted but are not required to attend the Fairness Hearing.

The purpose of this Notice is to inform members of the Settlement Class of then-rights and obligations under the Settlement Agreement and to summarize its key provisions. Please pay particular attention to Parts VI, VII and VIII of this Notice, which describe what you need to do to receive your monetary award, the procedures you must follow if you choose to opt out or object to the Settlement, and what will happen in the months leading up to and following the Fairness Hearing.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.Background To This Settlement.1366

II.The Settlement Class, Class Representatives And Class Counsel.1367

III. Summary Of Programmatic Relief.1368

A. Statement of Principle.1368

B. Board of Directors .1368

C. Task Force.1368

1. Powers and Duties.1368
2. Composition and Tenure.1369
3. Accountability.1369
4. Available Resources.1369
5. Interaction with Operational Functions.1370

D. Coca-Cola’s Obligations.1370

E. Ombuds Function.■.1370

F. Joint Expert Review.1371

G. Pay Equity Adjustments.1371

IV. Summary of Monetary Relief.1371

A. Compensatory Damages Fund.1371

B. Make-Whole Relief Back Pay Fund .1372

C. Promotional Achievement Award Fund.1372

D. Promotional Claims Procedure.1372

E. Incentive Bonuses for Affiants.1373

*1366 F. Compensation of Class Representatives.1373

G. Attorneys’ Fees.1374

V.Plan of Allocation.1374

A. Distribution of Compensatory Damages Fund.1374
1. Allocation of Compensatory Damages Fund.1374
2. Individual Payment Cap.1374
3. Minimum Award.1374
4. Restricted Common Stock Election .1375
B. Distribution of Back Pay Fund.1375
1. Cash Awards.1375
2. Stock Option Awards.1376
C. Administrative Costs and Taxes.1377
VI. What You Need To Do To Receive Your Award.1377
VII. Your Right To Opt Out Or Object To This Settlement ;.1378
A. Procedure for Opting Out.1379
B. Procedure for Objecting.1379
C. Opt-Out Limit.1380
D. “Most Favored Nations” Clause.1380
VIII. What Happens Next.1381

■ IX. How To Obtain Additional Information.1382

I.

BACKGROUND TO THIS SETTLEMENT

On April 22,1999, a complaint seeking to represent a proposed class was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, claiming that The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola” or “the Company”), since at least April 22, 1995, had engaged in a pattern and practice of race discrimination in promotions, compensation and performance evaluations and that the Company’s employment policies and practices had a disparate impact on African-American employees. The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

On June 4, 1999, the Court entered a Scheduling Order limiting the first phase of discovery to whether or not class certification was appropriate. During the course of this discovery, plaintiffs, through their counsel, obtained and reviewed thousands of documents, including Coca-Cola’s Affirmative Action Plans, preliminary findings by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, and many internal documents detailing Coca-Cola’s human resources policies and practices. Plaintiffs, through their counsel, deposed members of Coca-Cola’s senior and human resources *1367 management, including outgoing CEO M. Douglas Ivester and outgoing Vice President of Human Resources, Michael Walters, and obtained affidavits from over 150 current and former employees of Coca-Cola regarding alleged race discrimination at the Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 F. Supp. 2d 1364, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2302, 2001 WL 210000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdallah-v-coca-cola-co-gand-2001.