Abdalla v. Southwind, Inc.

561 So. 2d 468, 1990 WL 68721
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 1990
Docket89-01727
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 468 (Abdalla v. Southwind, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abdalla v. Southwind, Inc., 561 So. 2d 468, 1990 WL 68721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

561 So.2d 468 (1990)

Thomas F. ABDALLA and Christine Rider Abdalla, Appellants,
v.
SOUTHWIND, INC., Appellee.

No. 89-01727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 1990.

Thomas E. Shipp, Jr. of Turk & Shipp, Cape Coral, for appellants.

Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee.

SCHOONOVER, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellants, Thomas F. Abdalla and Christine Rider Abdalla, challenge a final judgment, which includes an award of attorney's fees, entered in favor of the appellee, Southwind, Inc.

We find no merit in any of the appellants' contentions concerning the entry of the judgment in favor of the appellee and, accordingly, affirm the final judgment in that respect. We agree, however, that when the court awarded attorney's fees it erred by not setting forth the findings required by Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), modified, Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla. 1990). The record indicates that the trial court was presented with sufficient evidence on the factors which must be considered in fixing reasonable attorney's fees. See Rowe. The court, however, in its order establishing the fees failed to include specific findings as to the hourly rate, the number of hours reasonably expended, and the appropriateness of reduction or enhancement as mandated by Rowe. Accordingly, even though we do not conclude that the record establishes that there was reversible error in the amount of the fees awarded, we must remand for the entry of an order setting forth the findings required by Rowe. Clarkson v. U.S. Home Corp., 529 So.2d 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); De Loach v. Westman, 506 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Affirmed in part and remanded.

HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baratta v. Valley Oak Homeowners' Ass'n at the Vineyards, Inc.
928 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Baratta v. VALLEY OAK HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N
928 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Atlanta Casualty Companies v. Anites
753 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
DHRS v. Crossdale
585 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Lee County v. Tohari
582 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gil
573 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 468, 1990 WL 68721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdalla-v-southwind-inc-fladistctapp-1990.