Abdalla v. ESTATE OF LAWRENCE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Abdalla v. ESTATE OF LAWRENCE

234 S.W.3d 500, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1051, 2007 WL 2034238

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 17, 2007

DocketED 88812

StatusPublished

This text of 234 S.W.3d 500 (Abdalla v. ESTATE OF LAWRENCE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abdalla v. ESTATE OF LAWRENCE, 234 S.W.3d 500, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1051, 2007 WL 2034238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. as managers for United Stated Aircraft Insurance Group (“Insurers”) appeal from the denial of their motion to intervene in a wrongful death action filed by Nazmieh Abdalla and Husni Ahmad Alsar-abi (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”). Insurers contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 52.12(a)(2) because Insurers had an interest in defending their insured in the wrongful death action, the disposition of the action impeded Insurers’ ability to protect their interest, and Insurers’ interests were not adequately represented by the existing parties. We find no trial court error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. as managers for United Stated Aircraft Insurance Group (“Insurers”) appeal from the denial of their motion to intervene in a wrongful death action filed by Nazmieh Abdalla and Husni Ahmad Alsar-abi (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”). Insurers contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 52.12(a)(2) because Insurers had an interest in defending their insured in the wrongful death action, the disposition of the action impeded Insurers’ ability to protect their interest, and Insurers’ interests were not adequately represented by the existing parties. We find no trial court error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 S.W.3d 500, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1051, 2007 WL 2034238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abdalla-v-estate-of-lawrence-moctapp-2007.