Abdal Razak Ali v. Barack H. Obama
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ABDAL RAZAK ALI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-1020 (RJL) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al., ) ) Respondents. )
MEMORANDU~ER (September S- ,2010) Before the Court is petitioner Abdal Razak Ali's Motion for Additional Discovery.
This Court held a hearing on August 26, 2010, regarding petitioner's motion and issued
an oral order directing the respondents to review certain medical records and disclose
certain information to petitioner's counsel. On September 1,2010, the Court received
notice from the respondents of their compliance with the Court's order.
Paragraph I.D of the Case Management Order [#1423] governing the procedures
of this case specifically provides, inter alia, that any request for discovery "must: (l) be
narrowly tailored; (2) specifY why the request is likely to produce evidence both relevant
and material to the petitioner's case; ... and (4) explain why the burden on the
Government to produce such evidence is neither unfairly disruptive nor unduly
burdensome to the Government." Because the petitioner has failed to meet these
requirements, it is hereby ORDERED that the petitioner's Motion for Additional Discovery is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
~ RICHARD. N United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abdal Razak Ali v. Barack H. Obama (Abdal Razak Ali v. Barack H. Obama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.